Skip to content

JASCO JASCO

  • News
  • Events
  • E-Store
  • My Account
  • Contact Us
  • Worldwide
Search
Click to view menu
MENUMENU
  • Products
    • Chromatography
      • HPLC
      • RHPLC
      • UHPLC
      • LC-MS
      • Preparative LC
      • Analytical SFC
      • Semi-Preparative SFC
      • Hybrid SFC
      • Fuel Analysis by SFC-FID
      • Preparative SFC
      • Supercritical Fluid Extraction
      • Chromatography Software
    • Molecular Spectroscopy
      • Circular Dichroism
      • High-Throughput CD
      • Vibrational CD
      • Circularly Polarized Luminescence (CPL)
      • Polarimeters
      • FTIR Spectrometers
      • FTIR Microscopy
      • FTIR Portable
      • Raman Microscopy
      • Palmtop Raman Spectrometer
      • Probe Raman
      • UV-Visible/NIR Spectrophotometers
      • UV-Visible/NIR Microscopy
      • Fluorescence Spectrophotometers
      • Film Thickness
      • Spectra Manager™ Suite
    • Refurbished
      • Refurbished HPLC Systems
      • HPLC Switching Valves
      • FTIR Accessories
  • Service
    • Service and Support Plans
    • Service Request Form
  • Applications
  • KnowledgeBase
  • Learning Center
    • Best Practice
      • Circular Dichroism Tips & Tricks for Biological Samples
      • CD Scale Calibration with ACS
      • Fluorescence Tips & Tricks
      • Raman Spectroscopy Tips & Tricks
    • Training Videos
      • ChromNAV
      • SF-NAV
      • Circular Dichroism
      • UV-Visible/NIR
      • Fluorescence
    • Training Seminars
      • Training Registration Form
    • Webinars
    • eBooks
    • Theory
      • Theory of Molecular Spectroscopy
      • Chromatography
  • About Us
    • President’s Message
    • Contact
    • History
    • Careers
  • News
  • Events
  • Worldwide
  • Shop
  • My Account
  • Contact Us

Home / Applications / Evaluation of Silica Columns for Increased Resolution in SFC separations

  • Industry

  • Technique

Evaluation of Silica Columns for Increased Resolution in SFC separations

By Heather Haffner

PDF IconDownload This Application

August 18, 2022

Introduction

SFC has been well established for enantiomeric separations and purifications in the pharmaceutical industry as well as for fuel analysis, gasoline and diesel, using the ASTM D5186 and D6550 methods. As alternative fuels are being developed, there is an increased importance on the analytical testing for comparing these new alternatives to the traditional fuels.

Both ASTM methods use a silica column for the separation, while D6550 secondarily employs a silver column for retention of the olefins after the alkanes and aromatics are separated. Our goal in this application is to further optimize the ASTM methods by evaluating a variety of silica columns to maximize the separation efficiency.

Jasco SFC-FID
Jasco SFC-FID

Both ASTM methods use a silica column for the separation, while D6550 secondarily employs a silver column for retention of the olefins after the alkanes and aromatics are separated. Our goal in this application is to further optimize the ASTM methods by evaluating a variety of silica columns to maximize the separation efficiency.

Experimental

Equipment Conditions 
CO2 Delivery Pump:PU-2080-CO2Column:Various
Autosampler:XLC-3159ASCO2 Flow rate:2.0 mL/min
Column Oven:CO-2060Column temp.:35oC
PDA Detector:MD-2018 (High pressure cell)Back Pressure:Various
FID:DANI Oven-FIDWavelength:225 nm
Back Pressure Regulator:BP-2080FID Splitter:200 oC
  FID Detector:350 oC
Figure 1. Silica Column Comparison. Back Pressure 120bar.Blue line = FID, Pink line = UV at 225nm. Peaks: 1. Hexadecane, 2. Cyclohexane, 3. Toluene, 4. Naphthalene.

Figure 1 shows the comparison of the 6 silica columns from various manufacturers at 120 bar back pressure. The JASCO column is the only one that shows any separation of hexadecane and cyclohexane and clearly shows the most resolution between those peaks and the toluene and naphthalene peaks. Figure 2 shows this same comparison at 200 bar and again the separation of hexadecane and cyclohexane is the best and the resolution between those peaks and toluene and naphthalene is the largest.

Figure 2. Silica Column Comparison. Back Pressure 200bar.Blue line = FID, Pink line = UV at 225nm. Peaks: 1. Hexadecane, 2. Cyclohexane, 3. Toluene, 4. Naphthalene.

As the Princeton 60A and the JASCO columns were the only ones to show separation of hexadecane and cyclohexane, those were further evaluated at a few other pressures. As the resolution of those peaks increased when running at 200 bar compared to 120bar, 150bar and 250bar were run to confirm the trend and also that higher pressure led to the best separation.

Figure 3. Princeton and JASCO Silica Column Comparison. Blue line = FID, Pink line = UV at 225nm. Peaks: 1. Hexadecane, 2. Cyclohexane, 3. Toluene, 4. Naphthalene.

As illustrated in figure 3, an increase in pressure led to better resolution and 250bar was proven to be the best back pressure on both columns, with the JASCO column proving to be the best. As the pore size of the JASCO column is 30A, a Princeton 30A was compared as well as a Phenomenex Kinetex HILIC column using a simplified 3 component mix. As shown in figure 4 the difference between the Princeton 30A and Princeton 60A is significant as the separation of hexadecane and cyclohexane is drastically improved. The Kinetex® column did not show much retention of any of the peaks. As the pore size was 100A that was likely a factor in the insufficient resolution of hexadecane and cyclohexane.

Figure 4. Silica Column Comparison. Back Pressure 250bar.. Peaks: 1. Hexadecane, 2. Cyclohexane, 3. Toluene

Conclusion

The pore size is a significant factor in the separation efficiency of the column for the separation alkanes and aromatics. The JASCO 30A provided the best resolution of hexadecane, cyclohexane and toluene with the Princeton 30A a very close 2nd providing equal resolution of hexadecane and cyclohexane, but less resolution of 5.4 compared to 7.7 on the Jasco silica.

This document has been prepared based on information available at the time of publication and is subject to revision without notice. Although the contents are checked with the utmost care, we do not guarantee their accuracy or completeness. JASCO Corporation assumes no responsibility or liability for any loss or damage incurred as a result of the use of any information contained in this document. Copyright and other intellectual property rights in this document remain the property of JASCO Corporation. Please do not attempt to copy, modify, redistribute, or sell etc. in whole or in part without prior written permission.

Featured Products:

  • SFC-4000 Analytical SFC for routine separation to method development.

    Analytical SFC System

  • SFC-4000 Preparative SFC system for preparative scale purifications.

    Preparative SFC System

  • SFC-4000 Hybrid SFC for analytical and semi-preparative SFC.

    Hybrid SFC System

About the Author

JASCO Application Note

Evaluation of Silica Columns for Increased Resolution in SFC separations

Introduction

SFC has been well established for enantiomeric separations and purifications in the pharmaceutical industry as well as for fuel analysis, gasoline and diesel, using the ASTM D5186 and D6550 methods. As alternative fuels are being developed, there is an increased importance on the analytical testing for comparing these new alternatives to the traditional fuels.

Both ASTM methods use a silica column for the separation, while D6550 secondarily employs a silver column for retention of the olefins after the alkanes and aromatics are separated. Our goal in this application is to further optimize the ASTM methods by evaluating a variety of silica columns to maximize the separation efficiency.

Jasco SFC-FID
Jasco SFC-FID

Both ASTM methods use a silica column for the separation, while D6550 secondarily employs a silver column for retention of the olefins after the alkanes and aromatics are separated. Our goal in this application is to further optimize the ASTM methods by evaluating a variety of silica columns to maximize the separation efficiency.

Experimental

Equipment Conditions 
CO2 Delivery Pump:PU-2080-CO2Column:Various
Autosampler:XLC-3159ASCO2 Flow rate:2.0 mL/min
Column Oven:CO-2060Column temp.:35oC
PDA Detector:MD-2018 (High pressure cell)Back Pressure:Various
FID:DANI Oven-FIDWavelength:225 nm
Back Pressure Regulator:BP-2080FID Splitter:200 oC
  FID Detector:350 oC
Figure 1. Silica Column Comparison. Back Pressure 120bar.Blue line = FID, Pink line = UV at 225nm. Peaks: 1. Hexadecane, 2. Cyclohexane, 3. Toluene, 4. Naphthalene.

Figure 1 shows the comparison of the 6 silica columns from various manufacturers at 120 bar back pressure. The JASCO column is the only one that shows any separation of hexadecane and cyclohexane and clearly shows the most resolution between those peaks and the toluene and naphthalene peaks. Figure 2 shows this same comparison at 200 bar and again the separation of hexadecane and cyclohexane is the best and the resolution between those peaks and toluene and naphthalene is the largest.

Figure 2. Silica Column Comparison. Back Pressure 200bar.Blue line = FID, Pink line = UV at 225nm. Peaks: 1. Hexadecane, 2. Cyclohexane, 3. Toluene, 4. Naphthalene.

As the Princeton 60A and the JASCO columns were the only ones to show separation of hexadecane and cyclohexane, those were further evaluated at a few other pressures. As the resolution of those peaks increased when running at 200 bar compared to 120bar, 150bar and 250bar were run to confirm the trend and also that higher pressure led to the best separation.

Figure 3. Princeton and JASCO Silica Column Comparison. Blue line = FID, Pink line = UV at 225nm. Peaks: 1. Hexadecane, 2. Cyclohexane, 3. Toluene, 4. Naphthalene.

As illustrated in figure 3, an increase in pressure led to better resolution and 250bar was proven to be the best back pressure on both columns, with the JASCO column proving to be the best. As the pore size of the JASCO column is 30A, a Princeton 30A was compared as well as a Phenomenex Kinetex HILIC column using a simplified 3 component mix. As shown in figure 4 the difference between the Princeton 30A and Princeton 60A is significant as the separation of hexadecane and cyclohexane is drastically improved. The Kinetex® column did not show much retention of any of the peaks. As the pore size was 100A that was likely a factor in the insufficient resolution of hexadecane and cyclohexane.

Figure 4. Silica Column Comparison. Back Pressure 250bar.. Peaks: 1. Hexadecane, 2. Cyclohexane, 3. Toluene

Conclusion

The pore size is a significant factor in the separation efficiency of the column for the separation alkanes and aromatics. The JASCO 30A provided the best resolution of hexadecane, cyclohexane and toluene with the Princeton 30A a very close 2nd providing equal resolution of hexadecane and cyclohexane, but less resolution of 5.4 compared to 7.7 on the Jasco silica.

This document has been prepared based on information available at the time of publication and is subject to revision without notice. Although the contents are checked with the utmost care, we do not guarantee their accuracy or completeness. JASCO Corporation assumes no responsibility or liability for any loss or damage incurred as a result of the use of any information contained in this document. Copyright and other intellectual property rights in this document remain the property of JASCO Corporation. Please do not attempt to copy, modify, redistribute, or sell etc. in whole or in part without prior written permission.
28600 Mary’s Court, Easton, MD 21601 USA • (800) 333-5272 • Fax: (410) 822-7526 • jascoinc.com/applications

Close

Designed in Tokyo. TRUSTED globally.

View our support plans

Connect with JASCO

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • JASCO Sales
  • 800-333-5272

Receive the latest promotions and special offers

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Careers
  • Press Kit
  • JASCO Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
  • Environmental Policy

© , JASCO. All Rights Reserved.